AMERICA UNITES FOR KIDS & PEER vs. SMMUSD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv-02124-PA-AJW
Dear Gail Pinsker: (SMMUSD’s Public Relations Officer)
We are disappointed in you taking the time to point us to irrelevant documents that do not have the answers to the questions we asked. This is not acceptable. School starts in 1 month and parents have a right to know what our children are being exposed to. You have a duty as a public agency to provide us transparent and accurate information. None of the information we requested is privileged information that the district can keep to themselves.
1. The district has the PCB test results for SaMo and Olympic, making excuses not to share them is unacceptable. Where are they and what are the results?
2. What PCBs were removed from room 1, 5, 8, library and wood shop room? Was it just a window? All the windows? Just the door frame? Did they remove all the windows and all the door frames in the entire building? These documents you pointed us to do not answer these questions.
3. What was done in the 10+ other rooms the district tested in March 2015 that showed 24 of 24 caulk tests with PCB results up to 570,000ppm? Did you remove all the caulking in these rooms or are you planning on putting kids back in those rooms for another year?
4. The Q & A from May 2015 is just a PR spin with no facts! As I said before, we are a sophisticated group of parents that see right through this. We do our research, we have a far reach of contacts and we cannot be bamboozled by PR and lies. Please stop pointing to this document.
5. Where is the plan given to the remediators so they knew what PCBs to remove? That would tell us what was removed in each room and what rooms were remediated? If they did the work already, then you must have this document?
6. What company did this remediation work? Someone is getting paid, who is it? And how much?
7. The district is required to get bids for projects, where are they? (And none of us are willing to go through BOE meeting video as you suggested to see if they are there.) Please provide them to us.
8. Your Q&A asserts that PCBs over 50 ppm can be left in place. This is not accurate. The law is clear, PCBs over 50 ppm must be removed… immediately. Every inch of caulking does not need to be tested to verify there are PCBs. Based on standard building practices is reasonable to assume that all like-caulking in the same building contains PCBs. This fact has already been proven accurate in our schools: building G is an example.
9. The plan you pointed us to and the Q & A inaccurately states PCBs over 50 ppm can be managed in place illustrating that the district is blatantly disregarding the law and the EPA directive in the Oct 31, 2014 approval which says PCBs over 50 ppm are an unauthorized use and must be removed.
10. Your Q&A incorrectly states that MHS had no air levels above EPA’s levels. When in fact, as an example, MHS had air samples that exceeded 300ng in the Music room but rather than look for the source, they instead cleaned again. Yet the air was still high. So guess what, they cleaned again rather than look for the source. It took numerous cleanings to get one test result below 200ng, Environ then claimed the music room is now safe!?! Seriously? 3 tests are bad and 1 test is okay. We are educating kids here, and even they would know that if 75% of the tests failed that would make the room NOT SAFE and require identification of the source. Even when SMMUSD exceeds these thresholds they deem so important, they do not do anything about it! They are not looking to solve the problem, they are looking to manufacture evidence, even false evidence, as an excuse to do nothing! Even when 570,000ppm of PCBs was found in building G and the soil surrounding the building had to be removed, the district left children in the building and they still refused to test the whole building or remove all the caulking! Is there any threshold, any level of PCBs that would trigger the district to care enough about the kids and get them out of the buildings until they remove all the PCBs?
11. Now for the 3rd year in a row, SMMUSD is going to knowingly put kids in PCB contaminated classrooms and pretend that if they did not test the material themselves, then it doesn’t, couldn’t possibly, contain cancer causing, neurological, endocrine and developmental disrupting, toxicants that can have serious impacts on the children mandated to sit in these classrooms for 7 hours a day. Are we back to covering our eyes to pretend something that is there really isn’t because we can’t see it?
See letter to Sandra Lyon and the SMMUSD’s Board of Education dated Oct. 7, 2013 from AMPS, Malibu High PTSA, The Shark Fund, The Boys & Girls Club of Malibu, members of the Malibu High School Site Council, & Malibu Special Education Demanding that the SMMUSD take Steps to Keep Our Children and Teachers Safe:
In January 2014, SMMUSD staff raised concerns about PCB exposure in Malibu High School and Middle School (MHS) and Juan Cabrillo Elementary School (JCS) after three teachers reported thyroid cancer diagnoses.
See letter to Sandra Lyon from 12 teachers at Malibu High School:
The City of Malibu through Resolution No. 14-58 requests that the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD) conduct further source testing for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at all Malibu school campuses and in all rooms. Every inch of caulking does not need to be tested to verify there are PCBs. It is reasonable and based on standard building practices is responsible to assume that all like caulking in the same building contains PCBs.
See City of Malibu’s September 23, 2014 Resolution No. 14-58 below:
Despite the October 2013, January 2014 letters, and City of Malibu passing this Resolution, the SMMUSD refuses to relocate its students and teachers and administer any further testing, even turning down the offer of Malibu parent and supermodel Cindy Crawford to personally pay for the tests. The EPA, in the Oct, 31st, 2014 approval, made very clear that PCBs over 50ppm cannot be left in place. PCBs are not like lead paint and asbestos; they are not chemically the same nor are they handled by EPA the same way.
See Congressman Ted Lieu’s letter to Jennifer DeNicola regarding Malibu High School’s latest PCB Test Results being sent to EPA’s Administrator Gina McCarthy:
See news articles concerning the SMMUSD Pressing Vandalism and Trespassing Charges Against the Parent who Proved that the Malibu Schools are Contaminated with Toxic Cancer Causing PCBs:
In a bizarre twist, public school officials have filed a police report against a Malibu parent who allegedly took samples of window caulking from school buildings to test for toxic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), according to documents released by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD) is also actively looking for teachers and other community members who may be involved, even as two elected board members have condemned the effort. (see attached emails from Board members Craig Foster and Oscar de la Torre)
See School Board Member emails here:
For two years Malibu Middle and High School and Juan Cabrillo Elementary School have been in an uproar as more than 30 Malibu teachers and alumni have come forward with serious health issues known to be related to PCB exposure.
The SMMUSD appears to be more interested in attempting to limit their exposure to liability from a toxic tort complaint, rather than to just simply comply with the TSCA, and protect its students and teachers from this continuing harm.
This Malibu High School and Malibu Middle School along with Jaun Cabrillo’s campus map highlighting testing results of toxins and presence of illness (thyroid cancer, thyroid disease and nodules) paints a pretty convincing picture of the harm already caused. (The three teachers with thyroid cancer all taught in classrooms with toxic illegal levels of PCB in caulk or with wipe samples considered “PCB Contaminated” under the PCB Regulations. As of today, at least three student alumni have also been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. There are also at least 14 known cases of thyroid disease among teachers, and three cases of melanoma or pre-melanoma (a cancer which is also associated with exposure to PCBs) among teachers and former teachers, as well as other serious health problems.)
Despite the fact that PCBs were found at levels up to 470,000 ppm in room 506, and 505, the district failed to test the only other room in that building which is the special education room. Why would the district assume that this sole room in a building would not also have high levels of PCBs, knowingly leaving special education students in highly toxic classrooms?
If the classroom has no color coding, then the caulking has not been tested.
See America Unites for Kids demands for answers (PDF):AMERICA UNITES FOR KIDS DEMANDS ANSWERS NOT SPIN FROM THE SANTA MONICA MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
America Unites for Kids Seeks Retraction from the Santa Monica Malibu Classroom Teachers Association for Misleading, Libelous and Inaccurate Statements Concerning PCB Contamination in Malibu Schools
See America Unites for Kids November 23, 2015 letter to SMMCTA:
See SMMUSD’s July 21, 2015 letter in response to SMMUSD Parents’ Demand for Answers (PDF):
Parents’ Response to the SMMUSD:
1. On July 22, 2015 Malibu Parent Jeff Kletter stated the following in response to the SMMUSD’s July 21, 2015 letter containing misleading information:
Hello Gail Pinsker,
a : the quality that makes it possible to see through something
the transparency of a piece of glass
b : the quality that makes something obvious or easy to understand
the transparency of their motives
He says that there needs to be more transparency in the way the government operates.
2. On July 22, 2015 Malibu Parent Josh Malina stated the following in response to the SMMUSD’s July 21, 2015 letter containing misleading information:
Below is how the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District treats some of its families.
See link to Santa Monica Dispatch News Article Concerning Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School Disrict’s Retaliatory Acts Against Students and Parents by filing false claims of child abuse with the Department of Children and Family Services:
See link to other pending Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District’s litigation concerning retaliatory acts:
Student v Wendy Wax Gellis & Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District:
This lawsuit alleges that the SMMUSD and Wendy Wax Gellis are criminally liable for violations of California Penal Code § 11166 and 11172(a) et seq. for filing a knowingly false child abuse report with child services and the police.
Santa Monica Dispatch Article Concerning Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District’s Retaliatory Acts Against Students and Parents by Filing False Claims of Child Abuse with the Department of Children & Family Services.
See link to News Article here: http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2009/01/smmusd-vs-student/
The lawsuit alleges that an example of retaliatory action by the SMMUSD and Wendy Wax Gellis taken against this family includes knowingly and maliciously filing a false child rape and domestic violence allegation with the local law enforcement and with the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) in retaliation for parent’s exercise of their federally protected right to bring claims against the SMMUSD before the United States Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).
The family alleges that on December 18, 2013, SMMUSD employee named Wendy Wax Gellis made a knowingly false referral to the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS), and to local law enforcement that parent raped her own son. The allegations were determined by all investigating agencies to be unfounded.
For details of this pending Federal lawsuit go to:
“You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.”
It’s time to fire Superintendent Sandra Lyon
Email the Santa Monica Unified School District’s Board of Education: email@example.com